Dominique de Koe
For companies operating in the Netherlands, year-end is a critical control moment for tax compliance. Dutch tax authorities increasingly rely on data consistency across VAT returns, corporate income tax filings, payroll tax submissions, and statutory accounts. As a result, issues that remain unresolved at the end of 2025 often surface in 2026 in the form of questions, corrections, or audits from the Belastingdienst.
A structured year-end review is therefore not merely advisable, but standard practice in professional tax management.
VAT Review as a Year-End Control Measure
Before closing the 2025 financial year, companies should take a final, consolidated view of their VAT position. This includes assessing whether VAT returns submitted throughout the year align with the underlying accounting records and whether the correct VAT treatment has been applied to domestic and cross-border transactions.
Any discrepancies identified at this stage can often still be corrected through the final VAT return of the year. From a tax compliance perspective, resolving these matters proactively is far preferable to submitting retrospective corrections in 2026, which tend to draw additional scrutiny.
Corporate Income Tax Alignment Before Closing the Year
Year-end is also the appropriate moment to assess expected corporate income tax exposure. While the formal corporate income tax return will be filed later, Dutch best practice is to establish a reasonable estimate of taxable profit before the year is closed.
This allows management to evaluate deductible and non-deductible costs, review provisions and accruals from a tax perspective, and ensure that assumptions made for tax purposes are consistent with the financial accounts. For foreign-owned entities, this process often includes reviewing transfer pricing positions and intercompany transactions to ensure alignment with documentation requirements.

Consistency Between Accounting and Tax Positions
One of the most common triggers for follow-up questions from the Belastingdienst is inconsistency between accounting data and tax filings. Differences between reported revenue and VAT, or between salary costs and payroll tax submissions, are increasingly identified through automated checks.
From a tax compliance standpoint, year-end is the last opportunity to ensure that accounting records, VAT returns, and corporate income tax assumptions tell a consistent and defensible story.
Entering 2026 with a Defensible Tax Position
Companies that approach year-end proactively enter 2026 with clarity rather than uncertainty. Outstanding VAT issues have been addressed, corporate income tax exposure is understood, and tax positions are properly documented. This significantly reduces operational distraction in the new year and places the company in a stronger position should the tax authorities request additional information.
Primebridge Global supports international companies with ongoing Dutch tax compliance obligations, including VAT, corporate income tax preparation, and communication with the Belastingdienst.